In a sane world, a low native birth-rate would be the strongest argument AGAINST mass immigration.
-
At such large social scales, with that kind of phenomenon, planning is not feasible.
i.e. making plans that are actually effective (granted it doesn't stop people from often making infeasible utopian plans to "change the world", but those are generally idiotic virtue signalling).
-
-
It's an interesting topic. I'm not convinced. I think it depends on the capacity of the planners and what you define as a plan. The York Minster Cathedral took 252 years to complete. American WW2 entry was planned and at some of the largest scale possible.
-
90% cuck mindset stumbling about, 10% plan.
-
A 100% plan would be absurd on such a scale, so 10% plan is still a plan and plan enough. If I wanted to make a directive at that scale, I'd devise general but specific enough protocols based on knowledge on par with Tzu's Art of War. Qabalah and I Ching also come to mind.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.