In a sane world, a low native birth-rate would be the strongest argument AGAINST mass immigration.
-
"No one plans anything."
At such large social scales, with that kind of phenomenon, planning is not feasible.
-
-
i.e. making plans that are actually effective (granted it doesn't stop people from often making infeasible utopian plans to "change the world", but those are generally idiotic virtue signalling).
-
It's an interesting topic. I'm not convinced. I think it depends on the capacity of the planners and what you define as a plan. The York Minster Cathedral took 252 years to complete. American WW2 entry was planned and at some of the largest scale possible.
-
90% cuck mindset stumbling about, 10% plan.
-
A 100% plan would be absurd on such a scale, so 10% plan is still a plan and plan enough. If I wanted to make a directive at that scale, I'd devise general but specific enough protocols based on knowledge on par with Tzu's Art of War. Qabalah and I Ching also come to mind.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.