Proving that we are all just one ordinary family.
Here's my old proposal for this: https://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2006/11/raw-idea-to-avoid-being-cooked.html … Abstract: Get proper industrial inputs and propellant from Ceres, make refractive (not reflective) Venetian blinds, park at Earth-Sun Lagrange 1, humanity wages World War III in dispute over global thermostat setting. :-)https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1065993396395880448 …
-
-
-
If families can't even agree on setting a thermostat, how are 7 billion mutual strangers supposed to agree on it?
-
Smart contracts or we are probably all f’ed
-
Blinds might be controlled, not by a vulnerable organization, but by trust-minimized smart contracts on a public blockchain via proplets: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/proplets.html …
-
Exactly. Trust minimization at the infrastructure level allows for trust maximization for a local outcome. If you don’t even have to trust the system, you can trust your transacation on it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"...other effects of excess carbon dioxide such as ocean acidification and faster and differential plant growth... do not justify the vast costs of reducing carbon dioxide emissions. Indeed faster plant growth is probably a major economic benefit." - Agree on plants.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am vehemently opposed to participating in anything related to Earth's atmosphere. There is so much we don't know. Acting on our ignorance could have literally catastrophic consequences.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Besides possibly destroying life on earth, 10/10 for being so romantic about it :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Direct physical intervention, especially something removable/destructible, makes far more sense than assuming CO2 is the only relevant factor, that no unidentified negative feedback mechanism that would stop CO2-induced warming exists, and that laws can dictate CO2 levels.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I always enjoy your blog posts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gov would never go for a solution if it doesn’t involve increasing their power over the ppls lives. Sadly, many leftists believe govs care about climate change because they’re virtuous and benevolent lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But what does dimming the sun do to crops?
-
Minimal effects. A lot of farmers use shade cloth in the summer to cut sunlight upwards of 40% already.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why not just paint roofs white? The issue for me isn't find solutions to help it's getting the world to willingly accomidate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So now they finally admit it! The sun IS responsible for heating the earth, not CO2. I have hope for humanity yet.
-
Co2 is responsible for trapping the heat and preventing it from reflecting as much back into space.
-
We need bigger blocks and more SO2! :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Food production down due to decreased sunlight, solar less effective, we use more power and eclipse the effect
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.