But his alternative social platform is also centralized, thus censorable by infrastructure providers, & they made repeated bad decisions to use centralized payment processors. Despite their awful experiences they are still in early stages of learning about censorship resistance.
-
This begs for a question: Since we're having to do all this rights protecting ourselves, where does that leave government?
Governments are utterly superior when it comes to physical security -- which is why we have them -- but they quite suck when it comes to digital security. But then again so do centralized businesses.
-
-
Governments are good at force not security. Historically gov's have always backed up the coin by violence (fiat). Crypto is impervious to force, so for the first time ever gov's are powerless unless they get physical—which isn't good for a voter base...
-
Governments are not good at transparency, the Bitcoin blockchain is
#transparent & Western governments like the#UK &#USA cannot operate under transparency, their agenda is hidden in obfuscation & opaqueness
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Actually governments are really bad on "physical security". That's why the 2A is so important. Besides, the government can become the primary force that threatens your physical security.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.