No, they have decent moneyable properties as good as gold K fair since historically that's how we see them continually failing, but in reality, their value becomes marginalized by competition & they are forced to print or lose monetary power But if we ignore that it still fails
-
Mises Regression theorem wasn't broad enough (1) Didn't consider psycho-social utility (2) Didn't imagine digital-native form of money (3) In fact he himself once said that "Gold isn't theoretically ideal. An ideal money would be one with no use-value at all to cause distortions"
It didn't account for foresight: that one can look at a tech or institution, study, and find it good for something, e.g. for using as money, just as e.g. one can study an insurance company and find it useful for insurance, even though it didn't start doing something else first.
-
-
So anything can be money if we were all just more enlightened. Oh, if only men were angels.
-
Your argument: Reality doesn't match my theory, therefore reality must adjust.
-
Perhaps you should pick up an economics textbook & figure out what it's all about. Lol. If you knew, you'd be laughing with me right now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.