"Code is law."
"Sometimes laws should be broken."
Discuss.
@VladZamfir @VitalikButerin @TokenHash @_Kevin_Pham @CleanApp @NickSzabo4 @derose @el33th4xor
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @DZack23 @VladZamfir and
Salus Publica Suprema Lex (Public safety is the highest law) Necessity does not acknowledge any law. This is why Scipio killed Gracchus in the name of the law, stating "Now the consul has betrayed the state, let every man who wishes to uphold the laws follow me!"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Erikcason @DZack23 and
so
#CodeisLaw, insofar as it can maintain itself, but when under true crisis (such as the reforms that Gracchus was implementing in SPQR), or a hacker draining the DAO, the necessity of the decision for public safety of the community becomes the praxis of the law.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Erikcason @DZack23 and
Bitcoin has never done a fork to reverse unintended consequences of a smart contract, however large, and has a ruthless dogma against doing so. Thus its much smaller argument surface and much greater market value.
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @Erikcason and
That's because Bitcoin's pursuit of "astronomical improvement in FINANCE" has focused on digital assets and digital asset control, which is far easier to code/implement than even the easiest
#autorepoauto K w/ massive real world integration.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CleanApp @Erikcason and
Common sense as well as wisdom to tackle and even master the easy things before tackling the much harder and more advanced things. Especially when the easier things, money and many kinds of purely financial contracts, alone have $trillions in potential value.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @Erikcason and
"Money" is NOT easy. It's arguably the hardest and most complex socio-legal institution that humans have designed. Both exceedingly rational & irrational; global & hyper-territorial; etc.
#AutoRepoAuto is the easier thing. Says who? Szabo'94.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CleanApp @Erikcason and
Nope I didn't say that, and certainly don't now believe that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @Erikcason and
This is so frustrating, dude. You know how many times you used "money" in that article? ZERO. What are you doing, man?pic.twitter.com/noaNIrI0um
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CleanApp @NickSzabo4 and
90% of your published output is showing how complex and weird and diffused and pluralistic humanity's approach to money has been. That's like,
#Szabo101.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Use of money yes, the money itself no. I observed very consistent patterns across seemingly disparate tech of precious metals, shells, etc. https://nakamotoinstitute.org/shelling-out/ and that these basics were missing from banking's digital "money". Now we have them back with cryptocurrency.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.