"Code is law."
"Sometimes laws should be broken."
Discuss.
@VladZamfir @VitalikButerin @TokenHash @_Kevin_Pham @CleanApp @NickSzabo4 @derose @el33th4xor
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @DZack23 @VladZamfir and
Salus Publica Suprema Lex (Public safety is the highest law) Necessity does not acknowledge any law. This is why Scipio killed Gracchus in the name of the law, stating "Now the consul has betrayed the state, let every man who wishes to uphold the laws follow me!"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Erikcason @DZack23 and
so
#CodeisLaw, insofar as it can maintain itself, but when under true crisis (such as the reforms that Gracchus was implementing in SPQR), or a hacker draining the DAO, the necessity of the decision for public safety of the community becomes the praxis of the law.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Erikcason @DZack23 and
Bitcoin has never done a fork to reverse unintended consequences of a smart contract, however large, and has a ruthless dogma against doing so. Thus its much smaller argument surface and much greater market value.
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @Erikcason and
That's because Bitcoin's pursuit of "astronomical improvement in FINANCE" has focused on digital assets and digital asset control, which is far easier to code/implement than even the easiest
#autorepoauto K w/ massive real world integration.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CleanApp @NickSzabo4 and
Crypto
#materialhyperutility gains dwarf whatever "astronomical improvement in FINANCE" Bitcoiners can legitimately lay claim to. ALL crypto taken together today = $210B. That's 73% of WalMart's market cap ($286B). So whatever "astronomical" means, there's plenty of space left.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CleanApp @NickSzabo4 and
When Bitcoiners lock themselves into an
#immutabilitydogma, they are forcing existing#realworld economic processes to conform to Bitcoin strictures, instead of the other way around. Great for#CryptoDebtCollectors; not so great for innovation, experimentation, & economic growth2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
It's extremely good for innovation because it provides very good clues, as counter-intuitive as they may be, as to what kinds of innovations will work (i.e., innovations that focus on & improve trust minimization) and what won't. BTW market prices profoundly disagree with you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.