This is not a behaviour that is justifiably emulated. These people can afford to ignore all technology for the foreseeable future and are shielded by their fortunes. It is stupid to think that disconnecting kids from technology in their formative years is good because Gates does.
-
-
I think maybe demanding a poor family's resources and capacity for time and attention be stretched so far is unrealistic. My only point is that what is appropriate for a billionaire family is inappropriate for a poor one—and will certainly not lead kids to being billionaires.
-
Farmers living in the Midwest in the late 19th century had tons of kids and got along with no electricity whatsoever, much less electronic gizmos and the internet. A few of those kids became e.g. Henry Ford.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
It’s still not a good idea to lionize what paranoid billionaires who refuse to treat their own cancers and neglect their children do. Those kids who can breathe technology like air and drink it like water, as Dijkstra implied, will be prepared. Hackers don’t appear in a vacuum.
-
My mom was an accountant who brought home for us her work accounting machine, an Apple II with BASIC programming right when boot up. If you get that for your kids rather than an internet-and-mass-media box I couldn't recommend it more. But that's not what they sell these days.
-
My dad used to bring home his BBC election in the mid 80's. This is where first learned to write BASIC.
-
coded a bunch of atari games on a TI-82 after I saw Tetris being ran.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.