This is not a behaviour that is justifiably emulated. These people can afford to ignore all technology for the foreseeable future and are shielded by their fortunes. It is stupid to think that disconnecting kids from technology in their formative years is good because Gates does.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
No. Wrong. Gates and Jobs and others acquired their fortunes via a ruthless suppression of competition, the wholesale appropriation of the work of others, and most importantly being born into rich families that could withstand the financial shocks of repeated business failures.
99.9% of rich kids don't succeed like these guys did, they had a lot more going for them than that. (p.s. the parents that raised Jobs were middle class not rich).
-
-
It's mastery. They were masters of their work and ahead of the curve....not everyone achieves mastery
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rich kids don't have to succeed, but a far greater number of poor kids fail. A rich kid can afford to fail many times, a poor kid only once. Also, better double-check your Jobs' history.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.