-
-
Obviously it has implications if you explicitly identify with the oppressed group. My point is that censorship of it because of racial overtones is a foolish invitation to repeat the past for the sake of not admitting someone you dislike may be right.
-
Well if I parsed your latter correctly I can't say I disagree with it.
-
p.s. people call me, with substantial genetic justification, white, which means if I was there my land would be at risk of being taken because I'm white, quite utterly regardless of whether I identify as "white".
-
Hopefully the SA gov wouldn't know how to use BlockExploer or the Boer are moving into XMR.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Afaik the land is not taken because the owners are white, but because they have taken the land from others under the Apartheid regime. Restitution of property rights that have been violated in the past. Like restitution to jews expropriated by the Nazis. http://www.ruraldevelopment.gov.za/component/content/article/347-land-claim/re-opening/771-faq#.Ww5gKE1UGM8 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.