It's comical that some liberal American pundits will now pretend to care more about land reform in #SouthAfrica than black South Africans do, merely because @realDonaldTrump tweeted about it and therefore he must be a racist & wrong.
-
-
I’m not familiar with the history of land title claims in South Africa but if you believe in Natural Rights, any land possessed via aggression rather than a sale ought to be nullified. Rothbard discusses this in Ethics of Liberty. Do colonial invasion/rule count as aggression?
-
Statute of limitations. Laches. We are talking agressions that allegedly happened centuries ago. Time limits for recovery are a universal aspect of humane property law, otherwise practically all titles everywhere would be the subject of multiple disputes.
-
In the case of ZA, most land title is post-Boer-War; I think my titles in NJ and http://CA.US went back well farther. In ZA the bans on non-white land ownership extend much more recently than that, to now-living people, and all titles are legitimate to dispute.
-
A title dispute isn't legitimate unless there is a legitimate claim, i.e. a legal heir to an illegally displaced landowner. That is certainly not what is going on here in any way shape or form, and the confiscations are in no way, shape, or form legitimate.
-
A post-feudal non-nomadic plant-agriculture-and-buildings land title may not be a legitimate structure to impose on land used by nomadic herders; if it's imposed by a minority-race-only government only permitting members of the minority to own land, it can hardly claim that. 1/
-
Saying "My grandpa helped the king steal this land from your tribe" doesn't give white farmers a moral position to claim that black farmers or the new government can't do the same to them, even if it does give them legitimacy in disputes with other Anglo or Boer tribe-members. 2/
-
Property law (both common law and Roman), including principles like statute of limitations & laches, gives them that legitimacy. You are now just repeating, presumably inadvertently, socialist talking points that ignore or severely denigrate property rights and property law.
-
As are you :-), since from an African perspective, the British and Boer claims to property law are just as socialist, denigrating previous property rights and legal customs. Imposing a statute of limitations as "from back when we conquered this place" doesn't survive revolutions.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Communism is a euphemism for theft as well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not sure any particular ideology has a monopoly on that term right? The biggest acts of land reform occurred as part of the creation of modern states who are distinctly not communist. Thinking of course of the United States, Australia, etc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's not how peace & actual social progress work. Current allocations are unimportant. Dependable money & property rights are biggest factor in living stndrds & upward mobility. The poor do not end up on top when envy destroys the foundation of society under guise of equity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968 was called proving “fraternal assistance” and the period following was known as “normalization”. Orwellian
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who stole it first ? Turtles all the way down Mr Feynman ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.