The potential of a Turing-complete blockchain: CFDs, derivatives, rule-based pools of money, trust-minimized intermediation of cash flows, tons of things.https://twitter.com/paralleldown/status/1031948909785096192 …
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4
None of those things need turing completeness. Discrete Log Contracts, scriptless scripts, Simplicity
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @7d5x9
How do you propose to implement pools of money or cash flows with dynamic membership without Turing completeness?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
The blockchain does not need to execute a turing complete smart contract. Post's Theorum for more info. Simplicity will provide witness validation necessary for arbitrary complexity without any turing complete scripting on the chain itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @7d5x9 @NickSzabo4
But "cash flows" and "dynamic membership" are opaque enough to not be something I can peg down with any certainty.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Those are both clear terms. If you don't understand them you have some more learning to do in this space.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.