They make a new appropriation every year.
-
The previous president did at least once. Obama ordered the army to confiscate weapons from homes in New Orleans by force. Saying that troops are bound to follow orders because of their oath to the Constitution is ignoring the reason why the oath is to the Constitution.
One ignores just about anything in a 240-char or whatever tweet. There are exceptions to every rule, but that's far different from the constant bullshit innuendo suggesting or implying that the military should disobey Trump because he's issuing a raft of illegal orders.
-
-
The next person(s) who post the seditious and libelous innuendo on my timeline get blocked.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My only point here has been; troops swear an oath to the Constitution, not the president. Even when the Constitution says to follow orders, if those orders conflict with the Constitution they should not be followed. Note that I've only said to refuse unconstitutional orders.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I may take this out of its intended context, but "think twice before following the president's orders in a crisis"https://youtu.be/PKkUG1F2JiI
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.