![Guy Swann ⚡[Pay me in Bitcoin]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1179969545613795330/djNzdtP__normal.jpg)
Or alternative take, former top Intel official who served in multiple administrations in different capacities is punished for sounding the alarm after seeing worst fears confirmed after disastrous, albeit illuminating Helsinki conference.
A former unelected senior official, whom the Commander-in-Chief, ultimately responsible for our security, was trusting with security secrets, called that elected President a traitor. There are vastly greater problems with such sedition than the President's mere dislike of it.https://twitter.com/AriFleischer/status/1031734885449433088 …
-
-
-
Sure, avoiding nuclear war by refusing to participate in D.C.'s Russia derangement syndrome is such a disaster.
-
P.S. The American voters and electoral college knew Trump was much friendlier with Russia than Clinton, and elected him in spite of, or even in part because of that. Elections have consequences under our Constitution, and hating those consequences is zero excuse for sedition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nick. Is there a place where you write about your views on politics in detail? I’m frankly confused as I always assumed you would have anarchist leanings - the last six months appear to indicate a real reverence towards the state (or worse, to a single point of failure - Trump)
-
Different tools for different problems. I am strongly in favor non-violent security such as Bitcoin where it is possible. But alas, most political problems are not nearly yet amenable to coercion-resistant security and yet urgently need to be solved.
-
Thx. Reading. Best,
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nick what’s your take on Russian hacking/infiltration/influencing/psy-ops during the election ? Did it happen or is it a made up thing ?
-
Hard to say. It's easy to lie about secret evidence, and even public digital evidence is often easy to make up. The discussions of these alleged events have involved far more heat than light. Our intelligence bureaucrats need to be much more transparent about their evidence.
-
What do you think about the report from former intelligence experts concluding it was an internal leak? https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/ …
-
At least as plausible as Russians actually having done the hacking, but reports on it are few and far between because it violates the foaming at the mouth narrative on this topic among the D.C. journalist community and Democratic DoJ officials.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Frankly, for a supposed tyrant, Trump’s awfully restrained. I can imagine the “unhinged” things I’d be tempted to say and do in his place, all within the power of the presidency. On the evidence, Trump wields power differently than others, but not injudiciously or capriciously.
-
Exactly. I would have long ago fired the anti-democratic, anti-Constitutional unelected bureaucrats that seditiously tried to rig the election and are now trying to overthrow his constitutionally elected Presidency.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Succinctly put. Thanks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.