You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I get that, but the pledge to the Constitution comes before ALL orders, no matter where they come from.
Their pledge to the Constitution means quite straightforwardly that they must follow the President's orders -- that is what Commander-in-Chief means. They certainly cannot choose to follow some unelected bureaucrats instead, that would be a violation of their oath.
Following the Constitution means following all of it. If orders do not align with the text of the Constitution they should not be followed, even from the president. That's why the oath is to the Constitution and not to the president...
Which specific orders has the President given that do not align with the text of the Constitution? Put up or shut up.
The previous president did at least once. Obama ordered the army to confiscate weapons from homes in New Orleans by force. Saying that troops are bound to follow orders because of their oath to the Constitution is ignoring the reason why the oath is to the Constitution.
One ignores just about anything in a 240-char or whatever tweet. There are exceptions to every rule, but that's far different from the constant bullshit innuendo suggesting or implying that the military should disobey Trump because he's issuing a raft of illegal orders.
The next person(s) who post the seditious and libelous innuendo on my timeline get blocked.
If the president's orders are unconstitutional, the president is treasonous. I'm not advocating for the cause you're specifically talking about, but orders come after the Constitution. The Constitution is the factual statement of right and wrong for the United States.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
