Even if you don't use them to transact, doesn't the fact that you have a full node increase the network security by itself? (as it's validating/sharing)?
-
-
In theory, yes. If there was a shortage of reachable nodes on the network, or a shortage of nodes willing to provide the chain for bootstrapping to others, or a shortage of nodes able to quickly relay transactions. None of these services have been in shortage for years, though.
2 replies 1 retweet 25 likes -
Replying to @pwuille @Karalhoin and
It cant hurt
Besides, what about relaying, shunning, S2X and UASF?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eumartinez20 @pwuille and
The shunning by non-economic nodes is irrelevant as it has no force behind it.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Not if enough nodes do! So the others good?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eumartinez20 @evoskuil and
Q: How many full nodes is enough? A: One, our own. I guess to some extent, if you really can't run one yourself, you'd rather have many independent parties depend on full nodes with rules compatible with the rules you want. But really, you should use your own.
9 replies 37 retweets 123 likes -
Replying to @pwuille @eumartinez20 and
One's own full node is far more trust-minimized than an SPV node, but an SPV node that depends on the consensus of 100s of jurisdictionally diverse full nodes of others still involves much less trust than PayPal. I favor former but "might as well run PayPal" ill describes latter.
5 replies 5 retweets 72 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @pwuille and
How would one know how diverse are the nodes one is trusting? Are all of them accepting the new FedCoin inflation rule? Are they really just one big.... PayPal?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Much of this is common knowledge, knowable by credible opinion, but if one doubts the credible opinion one should indeed run their own full node. Casual users rely on such opinions much like they rely on brand names when they purchase other consumer products.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @pwuille and
The fact that the Fed prints dollars is common knowledge. The relevant question is how to prevent it. It cannot be prevented if wallets trust some anonymous party to validate for them, and cannot be prevented if some non-anonymous party does so.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
They don't have to trust"some anonymous party", they only have to trust the results of an extremely reliable network, 100s of jurisdictionally diverse nodes any one of which can yell on the internet if they catch any of the rest of them accepting invalid txs.
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @pwuille and
There is no way to validate people yelling in the Internet.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.