"Community" is very much the wrong way to think about a group of users of something you hope to scale. If it has to work like a little village your social scalability will be not be much bigger than that.https://twitter.com/naval/status/959260771598438402 …
It had trust minimization in the protocol even though the small community in 2010 probably could have trusted each other. Such protocol is what made it socially scalable, not that community. A village-sized trusting community in 2010 won't grow into a much bigger such community.
-
-
It's not a community, it's just a group of mostly mutual strangers, that is why Sybil attacks are possible.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
How much does the trust go away and how much does it move? Example, I don't need to strongly trust my bank's mobile app because my contract with them says they will protect and take responsibility for my funds. A Bitcoin open source mobile app needs to be completely trusted.
-
Nope. You can verify every line of code.
-
There’s multiple examples of open source projects with vulnerabilities in them. Still a moot point because how are you going to verify your hardware didn’t come rooted? Self sovereignty is not a good idea for normal people.
-
There’s still often ways to check. And cryptographic applications open source is still the most secure
-
No there isn’t.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What about dero community ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.