So much for mass media being champions of free speech. They only champion freedom for their own monstrous megaphones. Everybody else keep quiet and let self-appointed "journalists" dominate our discourse. https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/1027669651264888832 …
-
-
P.S. Alas I don't know of a good solutions, only a couple bad solutions that may or may not be good enough: (1) decentralized social ntworks, which being open source tend to be user hostile (2) laws protecting property rights in the investments of social ntwrk users
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
fair enough
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What Alex Jones does is not free speech. He has endangered the lives Sandy Hook parents countless times, they have to move many times. No rights are absolute. There is a reason why you don’t run a red traffic light, even when you have the right to own & drive an automobile.
-
Your traffic laws analogy is not applicable as it has nothing to do with free speech. Do you think the founding fathers weren’t aware that polarizing speech could result in harassment?
-
I think they were, but its pure fantasy to even suggest that they envisioned the world we live in today, or the modes of “speech” we now use. I still stand by what I said, no rights are absolute, which is what my analogy meant to communicate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.