Sorry. Doesn’t look like you’re Interested in logical discourse. By your logic you have a right to commandeer screen time and are censored if you are blocked from it.
-
-
Replying to @wheelyweb @peterktodd
That's the second time you're pretending me and
@peterktodd are not using rational arguments, and also the second time you're using the "by your logic" non-sequitor. It strongly suggest you're arguing in bad faith.4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Nick Szabo 🔑 Retweeted Nick Szabo 🔑
Got no time for people who turn debate into insults like that, I blocked him. BTW here is a libertarian property rights argument for making the deplatforming of long users illegal:https://twitter.com/NickSzabo4/status/1027084880415313922 …
Nick Szabo 🔑 added,
Nick Szabo 🔑 @NickSzabo4Property rights argument for why deplatforming long users should be illegal: "[As with prescriptive easements one] has a right to the mixing of their labor with property.... I put a lot of work into my Twitter account ... tilled the soil, sowed the seeds" https://elaineou.com/2018/08/07/a-lockean-theory-of-digital-property/ …Show this thread3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @provoost and
Sorry Nick. I don't buy thit argument. If my tenants signed a contract that said "you can piss on on carpet" then so be it. If you pissed on my rug for 5 years and one day I had enough of it, I have every right to tell you to fuck off. (Not accounting for laws)
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Both legally and morally you do not, you have lost the right to do so by creating a reasonable expectation on the tenant's part that they are allowed to use the property in that way. Similarly if a neighbor uses your lawn as a shortcut for five years and you don't object.
5 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @provoost and
Yes but what if one day I don't want you to use my lawn for a shortcut? Can I tell you to stop?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Legally no, not if the statute of limitations (e.g. 5 years) has run. Morally, your lack of enforcement means the neighbor reasonably relies on expectation of continued use, may have even invested in improvements (as has a social media user, as Elaine describes in the OP link).
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @provoost and
This is news to me. So if someone was using my lawn as a shortcut for 5 years (without a contract) and now I wanted to grow food, I'm shit out of luck?
6 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Yes. It's called a prescriptive easement (in some states "long user"). You still have all the rights of ownership except you can't use the property in a way that interferes with the shortcut, nor forbid that neighbor's use of the shortcut.
6 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @MrHodl and
So how does thay work if the neighbour has been using your property for shortcut outside your knowledge? Let's assume for the sake of the discussion that the shortcut isn't evident from repeated use...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
You have an obligation to help enforce your own property rights. You should be paying attention at least occasionally over the course of five years.
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @indvs3 and
In Portugal any interior plot of land that doesn't confront a public road has permanent "right of passage" through his neighbor. It's still private but the neighbor can't use that stretch for anything except as passage, forever.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.