Hmmm like http://Block.one ’s ICO “terms” for EOS... wonder if blacklisting US IPs is considered “persuasive”... given the litany of VPNs, and US citizens abroad with internet access originating from foreign IP address ranges.
But what is the "more"? You haven't answered your own question. It's just the typical hopeless 1,000i-jurisdictional mess, with even the top lawyers unable to tell people how to solve the problem or predict with reasonable confidence what the law will say for even 1 of the 1,000.
-
-
It's the uncomfortable dance between providing the client a sufficient description of the risk and factors affecting risk in a situation, and giving so many qualifiers that your advice becomes muddled and doesn't empower the client to make a decision
-
You can't give a sufficient description for the world's jurisdictions reached by the internet, and the woefully incomplete description you do give them is likely to empower them to make the wrong decisions.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Founder-developers should recognize that if their Org’s users cause the Org to violate US laws, there may be consequences for the founders (decision makers). Given the tolerance for that risk, they might provide financial disincentives to users who don’t mitigate litigation risk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.