George is a fellow OG but this is wrong. Bitcoin is seamlessly global, it does not and need not conform to the ideological speculations ("macroeconomic theories") of particular polities.https://twitter.com/GeorgeSelgin/status/1021553927324688386 …
-
Show this thread
-
Dr. Selgin was on the mailing list with Wei Dai and myself where in 1998 cryptocurrency (bit gold, and a bit later b-money) was invented. His description of free banking was very inspirational and informative.
3 replies 24 retweets 173 likesShow this thread -
(Also Larry White's description of free banking). My two-layer architecture (bit gold for the basic currency and settlement, Chaumian cash for the retail "bank notes") was inspired by the free banking system of bank notes redeemable on demand for gold at a gold window.
1 reply 9 retweets 100 likesShow this thread -
The lesson I drew from that and other aspects of history that the real money in these circumstances was gold -- that is what people wanted at the end of the day. If the gold window closed, the trust-based part of the system collapsed.
4 replies 22 retweets 158 likesShow this thread -
Trust and security considerations are far more important than speculations about aggregate human behavior. Psychologists have a hard time making their experiments on individuals repeatable. Macroeconomists speculate about vast numbers of interacting individuals, no repeatability.
6 replies 46 retweets 218 likesShow this thread -
High inflation causes savers and creditors large tangible harms, as we see today in Venezuela, Iran, Sudan, Nigeria, Argentina, &c. But alleged harms caused by much lower levels of "bad deflation" are very causally remote from monetary decisions -- it's ideological speculation.
4 replies 46 retweets 193 likesShow this thread -
While macroeconomic debates are very popular in the fiat central banking world, where monetary decisions are highly political, they are nevertheless ideological speculations not science.
7 replies 71 retweets 302 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
If you read Alan Greenspan’s work, the FED is completely professional & apolitical. I am not sure how or why they try to appease politicians. Congress has no authority over them as the federal reserve act.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Appointed by the President and Congress, able to transfer trillions of dollars to organizations of their choice, but "apolitical". That whopper is right up there with the ICO sams.
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4
Thanks Nic. You’re correct, they do transfer funds arbitrarily
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.