Blockchain fees/gas are way too unpredictable. L2s should focus far less on making fees lower & far more on making them more predictable. One flat 10,000 satoshi fee for a year's worth of txs can beat the heck out of fees that might add up to 1 satoshi one month & 5,000 the next.https://twitter.com/byourseff/status/1016795686506033153 …
-
So you're suggesting attaching a "fee subscription" model to address or companies that want stable fees? Isn't that going to complicate things? (Correct me if I misunderstood the response)
Yes it will likely complicate things for the relay while simplifying them for the user, but I expect relays will be able to make large profit margins by taking on this risk and complexity.
-
-
Interesting. I think in the long run when Bitcoin adoption becomes greatly widespread, the implementation of such a mechanism would be inevitable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yup the cost of optimal dynamic program solution gonna be <= to the optimal static solution. 1) to sell this insurance you need to get both solutions and that's gonna be costly 2) the dynamic solution going to be observable from the blockchain making model theft trivial.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.