In EOS a few complete strangers can freeze what users thought was their money. Under the EOS protocol you must trust a "constitutional" organization comprised of people you will likely never get to know. The EOS "constitution" is socially unscalable and a security hole.https://twitter.com/andimule/status/1008689616130633729 …
-
So, like the president of America? Imagine if there was 21 simultaneous presidents and more than 100 presidential candidates who you could be vote in or out because the election never ends and they could constantly be held accountable?
Then that would be 20 more people you'd know about 1/20th as well as you'd know one (and even one would be hardly at all -- how well do you know Christian Sewing or Jamie Dimon?). Either way, an utterly idiotic way to run a cryptocurrency compared to secure automation.
-
-
The problem is "secure automation" doesn't scale well for platform blockchains and there is a tremendous demand for scaling to take this movement to the next level. Love and respect what you've done for
$BTC, but platforms need more innovation and experimentation. -
Henry Ford's marketers found there was tremendous demand for a "faster horse." Doesn't mean that was the literally the best tech to satisfy what ordinary people (as opposed to technologically illiterate marketers) actually want.
-
Very good, but that says more about your inability to be flexible in you're thinking than it does about EOS
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is true, but having 1 gives ultimate control and no need for collusion to achieve This, 21 people incentivized to blow the whistle on collision helps keep them honest too, for just as I can't know them all 100% they can't know eachother 100%, Try to see pros AND cons
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
I guess I'm a proud member of that "subset." Human governance is ALWAYS fallible, vulnerable, and ultimately corruptable. Crypto is/was intended to minimize the human factor to the greatest degree possible; or, better yet, to eliminate it altogether via real decentralization.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
“I have no idea what’s going on, but will let you know after I’ve seen the results.”
-
Apparently he has as abundant access to experimental humans as pharma researchers have to lab rats.
-
This whole space is an experiment
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You seem to think you have a monopoly on what's best for people. Even if those very people disagree with you. Are you against free choice, or do you just think your opinion is more valid than ours? There's room for many varients mate. Maximalism helps no one
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NickSzabo4 please. don’t waste your time on these EOS Plebs.... they’re just bag holders eyeing attention. They lose a lot if EOS fails. Look at these fools@StopAndDecrypt - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.