Great thread about how much EOS depends on a naively drafted "constitution", human-interpreted wet code. As a result EOS will be labor-intensive, permissioned, jurisdictionally biased, and will have poor social scalability.https://twitter.com/panekkkk/status/1001627755736322048 …
-
-
Free association and free markets are a beautiful thing. If it turns out that code is better off as unassailable law then we will continue to see migration towards truly immutable blockchains. Perfect code is a narrow bullseye to hit, so EOS could well fill an important role.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I think the EOS approach is actually realistic and is meant to peacefully handle self-governance which we know isn't perfect nor utopian in practice.
-
This and many other aproaches have been already debated years before. There's no long term censorship resistance with this aproach.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Your comments expose an emotional bias. I wonder why?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
First time I have disagreed with you. Still respect you tons. Look forward to your continued input on
#eosThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's not a bug, it's a feature!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There’s a lot of ugliness in the
#smartcontract space as well; and we’re all complicit in the conceptual incoherence that we’re all thankfully starting to#CleanApp:https://medium.com/cryptolawreview/against-smart-contracts-4a1f43133215?source=linkShare-7e3dc6459714-1535170149 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nothing beautiful about systems that don’t protect property rights.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Here is the most recent draft: