NSFW Acc: 
Serious question: With so much weekly good input from pro players on twitter, why are PvP devs so stubburn to make class/PvP changes? Having more PvP content doesnt mean it is a better experience, but I know lots of people enjoy Wintergrasp, so GJ on that!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Well, if you read Twitter carefully, there are a lot of points in common in the opinions of many players that compete every week in the cups. So I think the opinions are pretty legit since they play different comps and classes
That would be 1. rated 2. 3s 3. arena at 4. gladiator rating. Idk if the whole game (even only pvp in general) should be balanced around that specific group. Not to negate their feedback, I just understand the difficulty in process that towards a funnier balance for all players.
-
-
I understand your point, I never said it was easy. But to be honest, 3v3 is the only competitive PvP format, so everything should be balanced around it (PVP wise).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Last time i read from a ranting dude playing resto druid that ret paladins should be nerfed because he got owned so many times by rets in 2s arena... >_> any player over 1800 would disagree, but who would you listen to? And why?
-
Thats why i said "pro players that compete in the cups every week" :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.