There definitely are; see: operating systems, service architectures, etc.
-
-
Tell me linux isn't collapsing under its own weight. Or windows.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PLT_cheater @yminsky
Not because of language. Because of systems architecture. Those things matter much more at scale.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
In a weird sense, a more powerful language can more easily paper over architecture issues (big hammer!).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @marius @PLT_cheater
Agreed. But how well can you do when you get both architecture and language right? I think the effects are addative.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
I've seen so much tech debt being racked up by employing powerful language constructs.
2 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
I have not
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
To be honest this conversation is so vague we can't be precise any more
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PLT_cheater @yminsky
Concrete example: monolithic kernels vs microkernels. One structure represents an inherently more scalable architecture. Regardless of lang.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Indeed, monolithic kernels are infinitely more scalable. Microkernels are a bad idiotic joke. http://tunes.org/wiki/microkernel.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Read my blog!