SNAPL submission rejected... I'm more eager to find out what the reviewers said than disappointed.
My take out from reviews: (1) trying to say too much, I communicated not enough, (2) too much vaporware, I need to implement it @Ngnghm
-
-
(3) I'll need to argue that "observability" is original. Hard to do a negative citation search, but I'll need to review literature
@Ngnghm -
Overall, I'm satisfied that the paper was rejected for good reasons, though of course disappointed by the outcome. Lotsa work ahead!
@Ngnghm
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Read my blog!