I don’t think that’s even true at the micro-level. It’s quite a minimal syntax across the board.
-
-
-
Compared to Haskell, with its infix type annotations, its operator zoo, and its implicit functions from typeclasses? Compared to APL (admittedly not quite "modern") and its super-terse combinators and "libraries" of known sequences thereof?
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
More than the syntax is the resulting code that tends to be a little on the verbose side on the micro-level
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Read my blog!