scheme friends: in the presence of a hygienic macro system like `define-syntax`, do you even need more traditional lisp macros e.g. `defmacro`? is there anything of value you could do with unhygenic traditional macros that you cant with `define-syntax`?
Replying to @ra
Syntax-case can fully replace defmacro, but syntax-rules is not enough. See my article about porting the nest macro from CL to Scheme...https://fare.livejournal.com/189741.html
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Read my blog!