Your magazine likes to take the negative perspective too often. Why? This is a moment of celebration for the British people and for those who love monarchies.
-
-
-
I think you’ll find that 70% of us here- don’t give a damn about this wedding. The Royals aren’t revered, like how they used to be. Seems folk from other places like them more than us..
-
That was not my main point. It was to point out that the New Yorker oppposes everything that has a shade of conservative tradition. I don't care much about this wedding as most weddings, unless it deals with a family member or friend.
-
Ah ok - this time it may have got it right though. We are used to anti-conservative stuff- I prefer it

-
Unfortunately here we are used to Radical extreme liberal stuff, which I detest!
-
Ah well- seems we are polar opposites. I’ve got an idea - you take the Royal Family

-
No need! I have my own that I very proud of! Wouldn't mind their comfort! Good luck!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When you’re allowed to marry for love it might work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mismatch
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'll say it again: wow!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No Epilogue please : before the Foreword.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Royal Kitsch.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.