Sounds like that ninth grader needs therapy.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Taking constitutional advice from a ninth grader that can't own a gun, can't vote, probably hasn't read the constitution, and most definitely hasn't read the federalist paper hahaha. Liberals....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nonsense. These Hitler Youth will not take away my constitutional rights or infringe upon them
#2A#DefendTheSecondThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Study those countries that have taken guns away from their citizens, i.e., China, Russia, communist countries, before you decide to disarm the American constituency.
-
Australia? UK? Norway?
-
None of those countries have the citizens pay for higher education.
-
Eh, kinda. Especially the Post-grad stuff. Miles cheaper than US stuff, though. But yes, that's a good thing for citizens.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are spot on; I support you and will campaign against Floridian candidates who don’t support reasonable restrictions on gun control: no assault weapons, buy back anyone whose assault weapon is made illegal or simply wants to get rid of a Legal gun, age 21 .....
-
Assault is an action. Guns are inanimate objects.
-
Read the sentence. Do you know what an adjective is? It is a word that describes a noun. The “gun is the noun & assault is an adjective when used together means a gun used to assault people-vs-a legit gun used for hunting/self defense. Sad you need grammer lessons to understand
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Which is why we need reasonable regulations to keep assault weapons out of the wrong hand like in the Supreme Court’s opinion in Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence (1984), holding narrow free speech restriction regulating time, place, and manner restrictions are lawful
-
Um, I thought you had mastered the English language. What part of "Shall not be infringed" are you not understanding?
-
I studied constitutional law in grad and law school. Shall not be infringed does not mean government can’t enact laws that reasonably restrict constitutional rights with laws or regulations that are narrowly tailored to address a compelling public interest in Time/place/manner.
-
Really? Because your leftist professors told you so? My History degrees, and years of research into our Founding Fathers, tell me that "Shall not be infringed" means exactly that. You, and many others, have added a "butt" clause...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And the children will lead them
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
you could move
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.