Too pink. Needs some orange. Oh and some Russian puppet strings.
-
-
-
You talking about Hillary and her Russia ties?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not sure they need the podium to hide his junk, the microphone would have been sufficient.
-
His junk would be hidden by his fat-gut-overhang anyway.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
That cover is way too flattering.
-
Also anatomy is wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Imagine if you will,
@NRO had a nude body shaming cover of@HillaryClinton. How do you think the liberal elitists@NewYorker react? -
Do you not get the reference to The Emperor's New Clothes?!
-
Of course I do. Do you think they’d have felt comfortable to do that to Hillary? Just because you have the literary reference doesn’t make it appropriate.
-
There would never be a need to do that to Hillary. But as they did with the Obamas, the New Yorker would have run a different themed unflattering cover.
-
Naked?
-
I refer back to the literary reference then. It's the perfect metaphor for him, and nekkidness is a key point. So it applies here. Now I'm done with you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Every time I think you have reached rock bottom, you manage to go even lower. You are now officially the National Enquirer, with no disrespect intended towards the National Enquirer, of course.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wow...just when you think Leftists couldn't sink any lower... What disgusting lowlives they've become.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.