This must be the most revolting, disturbing image I've ever seen in @NewYorker . I hope it does the same to everyone else who sees it.
-
-
-
Same here
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
delete this
-
I think we have to see it to realise what some children experience at the hands of their closest relatives abusing them for money.
-
I am not familiar with the story and don't want to read it. No need for that to know that this girl will be messed up for life. # abused.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How is this not child porn?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seriously disturbing that NewYorker would use this image. Where the f*** did they get this image from? A stock library? Think about it!!!
-
Quite. The very fact it was asked for may lead to more being produced...similar to the rationale behind viewing child pornography
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
something is seriously wrong with folks at
@NewYorker ... how on earth is this picture appropriate? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Stop using this photo for your article! If I see it reposted again I will be unsubscribing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This image is really tasteless. You tart up a kid for clicks???
-
The mag didn't do that, the photographer featured in the article abt wealth took it. Still mag cld have chosed diff photo, it is clickbaity
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This photo is cringe-worthy! Shame!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Disgusting
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What this picture has to do with "display of wealth"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.