Thank you, @rparloff, for your very well-written and balanced @NewYorker article presenting the merits of both sides to this issue.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Christians are so hypocritical! They have no right to judge anyone's lifestyle. God wants u 2 treat EVERYONE with RESPECT!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it not true that any business can refuse service to any person at their own discretion? What's law say minus the hot buttons?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you give an inch !!!!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can a White person "deny a Black person services based on a SUSPECT CLASS" but alleging its "his religious freedom?" Uh, no.
-
It's just another "made up legal controversy" with ZERO LEGAL PRECEDENT to support it. How's it DIFFERENT than Jim Crow? Ugh.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry, there is no "credible nexus" between "exercising religious freedom" and WILLFULLY DISCRIMINATING against others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wrong. There is no "issue to be adjudicated" here because the "person trying to discriminate" HAVE NO INJURY IN FACT: STANDING.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Love thy Neighbor As Thyself (no exceptions) "Judge not lest ye be judged' Matthew 7:1 Follow your faith not your fear.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#FakeNewsMedia#Lies#Deceit and a question for The New Yorker#LiberalZombie readers.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Instead of a portrait artist could we have a team of bakers recreate the courtroom scene on a set of jam and cream sponges?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this depends. There is a fine line between protection of religious practice and freedom from discrimination. It primarily in my o
-
Tweet unavailable
-
need a very good and compelling reason with an example of its effect. Now...if you are private and not public, (you don't hold st
-
ock publicly, or are a one of two store chain. Or if there are numerous other alternatives with the same result, and it meets the
-
private small business element...yes they can refuse really anyone service (interreligious marriages are and discrimination on re
-
ligious grounds requires strict scrutiny test (the highest, higher then intermediate standard.) if THAT is permissible, so would
-
the other...but if you have multiple stores. Or are on the public market, or there is no reasonable alternative available, then i
-
s illegal. Should it be? If it's totally private then...yeah, you have the right to be gay, but someone else who is a private, sm
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Since these r mainly sole proprietors the best way 2 change their minds is a boycott Their religious beliefs will come in 2nd 2 $
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.