Please retract and correct title of this article. Please read:pic.twitter.com/fh3HqjEu2E
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Please retract and correct title of this article. Please read:pic.twitter.com/fh3HqjEu2E
Very misleading headline... "Ill-informed, far fetched and absurd is right", Emma @emmaarango I hope @NewYorker retract this. #Colombia 
well it only means you prefer the fighting to continue, thus more ppl will suffer instead of turning a new page
the question asked should be 'why'
Not PEACE!!! A Bad agreement!!! replace our Constitution!!! 7 reasons to vote NO! Traslate...http://www.semana.com/nacion/articulo/siete-razones-para-votar-por-el-no/496358 …
they didn y reject peace, they rejected impunity to narco terrorism. For less than they suffered you destroy entire nations
you're a smart periodical I would revise your headline if I were you. 
they wouldn't reject the peace if FARC conduct more actions
New York papers always inciting more violence and ignorance but when UK wants to kill 1M people then its all fine
that's a very misleading headline. Don't help bury the process and then kill all hope for peace. Now No-ers need to be convinced.
it wasn't about rejecting peace, it was about having a better agreement for all the Colombians, investigate first boys
They rejected to surrender
Also #Colombia ppl shown the don't even care about military atrocities & the state deathsquads getting amnesty #ColombiaDecide
we didn't, we understand that peace isn't possible with a deep division in our society. We need to include other points of view
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.