No, that requires regulation of monopoly. 'Course, we don't think ISP biz is monopolistic, right?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-It will make it more expensive as bandwidth hogs like Netflix and Amazon are charged more money & then pass cost on to customer.
-
that's the opposite of how net neutrality works
-
-- No it's not. They want bandwidth hogs to pay more for using more. Look it up.
-
ISPs want that. Net Neutrality protects against it. I work in the field & have been following this for yrs. You have it backward
-
-- of course ISPs want to cover costs. What would keep them from raising prices?http://www.techtimes.com/articles/36593/20150302/why-net-neutrality-cost-money.htm …
-
"bandwidth hogs like Netflix and Amazon are charged more money & then pass cost on to customer" is what you said. That's wrong.
-
Okay, so the service providers will charge consumers the extra money. I don't see much difference. It all comes out in the wash.
-
1) In (a) prices for web services would certainly go up w/ no added value for consumers
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
that's not the issue. It's that walled gardens limit competition for and access to content.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.