The New YorkerVerified account

@NewYorker stop comparing the two. They both are talented. MJ has nothing to do with that. Let Prince have his own shine he earned it.

@NewYorker As have many artists. Not sure why this comparison is salient in your view.

@NewYorker down Michael Jackson in order to honor Prince. And the fact that people still feel the need to do this speaks volumes.

@NewYorker today. MJ was a pioneer and no celebrity has ever reached his global status. Give respect where it's due. You don't need to put

@NewYorker Against each other is disrespectful. MJ had his own style and sound as well, and that's why his influence is still very great (3)

@NewYorker Nontheless, I mean no disrespect. Prince was incredibly talented and deserves the recognition. But continuing to pin him &MJ (2)

@NewYorker They were different. No need to compare.

@NewYorker Prince had his own magnetism, unique and wholly different from Michael Jackson's. No need to compare the two.

@NewYorker No doubt both they shone with great own light. It remains interesting to compare both titans.@MJacksonHD @michaeljackson @prince

@NewYorker No comparison. How lame

@NewYorker The fact that you even need to mention MJ to attract readers speaks a lot about the level of Prince's magnetism vs MJ's level (1)

@NewYorker y use Michael Jackson's name when article is totally re Prince? Double the clickbait maybe?

@NewYorker Very true