@NewYorker @HBagration @LKrauss1 Totally agree. All this "respect" for religion is utterly bogus.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 Why is science pitched always religion? Aren't both aimed at understanding the world around and our relationship to it?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 And yet, scientists too are urged to "believe" in militant atheism- no less? Baffling argument.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1: your points are perfect... But of course, a religious zealot above and below will disagreeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 Scientists should be atheists? Gee, guess Albert Einstein was a lousy scientist, then...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 the hottest of takes@mossymanse@circusfloorThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting:"
@NewYorker: All scientists should be militant atheists,@LKrauss1 argues: http://nyr.kr/1VNvk10 ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 Hi, I'm a physicist turned expert on theology, culture, and history - thanks to TV, editorials & strawman.#PrivilegeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 I wrote a brief piece on my thoughts concerning this & the relationship btwn faith & sci here: https://www.facebook.com/the.famous.adventurer/posts/842698559408 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 Ach ja - die Variante der Hugo-Stamm-Aufklärung, auf dem wissenschaftstheoretischen Reflexionsniveau des späten 19. Jh.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 yeah - rationality over all.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 he couldn't be more wrong. Science is the study of the natural world, not the supernatural. Morals come from where? -
@Maduro04@NewYorker@LKrauss1 Socrates, Spinoza, Locke, Paine, Nietzsche, Einstein, Baldwin
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 What an ignorant statement. Better create a "new" official religion then, cause it's almost the same.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 Our universe could be a scientific simulation; scientists should be agnostic. Who can be so certain about creation?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 Btw, I am a scientist and in no way do I or most fellow biologists think we have figured all the major questions yet. -
@vishwapriya25@NewYorker@LKrauss1 Some people think that their science degree makes them expert on everything else.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@NewYorker There is no objective side-free society. Science pushes agenda under guise of objectivity, which, come on, is pretty silly.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1@NeilJamesFoster @jrochow172 and all scientists should be better trained in fact ascertainment and logic.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@LKrauss1 All you have to say is "God wants me to be a scientist." No need to get militant about it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.