Just fine for @JebBush RT:“@NewYorker: Since the 1960s, the science of thermal comfort has tended to neglect women: http://nyr.kr/1MJOvFN ”
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@anthonylydgate The stupid, it burns -
.
@DickPatriarchy Actually, per the article, it cools.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker Finally.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@pnashjenkins "Is ____ sexist" articles are singlehandedly keeping the print industry aliveThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Like most workplace things RT
@NewYorker Since the 1960s, the science of thermal comfort has tended to neglect womenhttp://nyr.kr/1MJOvFNThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@anthonylydgate I think the article fails to put enough emphasis on summer work attire and it's obvious bias against men. -
@aewrowe1@NewYorker It would be a bias if offices were too warm for men, but the point is they’re cooled for male attire.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@NewYorker Buildings were cooled and still are for slender men in business suits. This was before the 16oz Big Gulps and female bosses.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NewYorker@KLNMets Applesauce. When I don't have to wear a t-shirt, long shirt, neck tie, long pants, & jacket then we turn down the ACThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.