“@NewYorker: Today's Daily Cartoon: http://nyr.kr/1Fbsz2V pic.twitter.com/hNDPlOLW5w” | La monetización degradante del arte. Consumismo al cubo
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
“@NewYorker: Today's Daily Cartoon: http://nyr.kr/1Fbsz2V pic.twitter.com/hNDPlOLW5w” | La monetización degradante del arte. Consumismo al cubo
.@NewYorker @theskysgoneout And, as ever, the caption can be perfectly replaced with ‘Christ, what a douche’.
@NewYorker What makes anyone think these paintings are going into museums?
@NewYorker Why are some of the numbers written out?
“@NewYorker: Today's Daily Cartoon by Christopher Weyant: http://nyr.kr/1Fbsz2V pic.twitter.com/WvrNEkE03i”
@AmitBadal @NewYorker A hundred years ago they could hardly eat.
“@NewYorker: Today's Daily Cartoon by Christopher Weyant: http://nyr.kr/1Fbsz2V pic.twitter.com/k4adfThv5s”
@NewYorker @inesdavena Directly in front of us is a Weyant, worth $5.99. Or at least, that's what The New Yorker does these days.
@NewYorker Pablo Picasso
by my father Carl Kohler 1919-2006
http://blog.chron.com/bookish/2014/08/carl-kohlers-neo-modernist-take-on-famous-authors/ …pic.twitter.com/0aJU6c2475
@NewYorker if painter knew his work worth so much now,good enough to save millions of poor ppl .He'll be mad at ppl who spend $ to buy it
@NewYorker my time spend on looking at these painting, and amazed by the price / value of such----- priceless.
@NewYorker love it man well done
@NewYorker I Love It.
@NewYorker Lord Darlington from Lady Windermere's Fan, "a man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing"
@NewYorker theres no wrong way to engage people in art.
@NewYorker @QuimMonzo "Le petit prince" was right!
@debolsillo @NewYorker @QuimMonzo "...a hundred and twenty-six million" is over 100
@NewYorker @dnkittredge if the number is under 100 it is written out
@jtschnitzler @NewYorker @dnkittredge umm... "a hundred and twenty-six" is more than 100
@jwindh @NewYorker @dnkittredge doesn't mean they did it correctly, but that is the general rule to answer his question
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.