Tim Wu: what the debate over #netneutrality
really stands for: http://nyr.kr/1lwxCx9 @NewYorker #brilliant
-
-
-
@STrimel@NewYorker Republican Commis. argue Congress,not#FCC can change rules.Where was that argument in 2002? http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/News_Releases/2002/nrcb0201.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Tim Wu on net
@NewYorker http://nyr.kr/1lwxCx9 misses it: access 2 credible information & public forum is vital 2 democracy not a commodityThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
MT
@NewYorker: Tim Wu@superwuster on what the debate over net neutrality really stands for: http://nyr.kr/1lwxCx9 ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@NewYorker: Tim Wu on what the debate over net neutrality really stands for: http://nyr.kr/1lwxCx9 ”finally a clear explanation#nofrontiersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.