-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It wouldn’t have made a difference. The man was caught on tape talking about physically assaulting women. Any other campaign would’ve ended in flames right there. He won because his campaign was tailored to appeal to millions of people with a laughably skewed worldview.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I thought it was hacked - info just never released...
-
That's what I thought too. I also think that there was some material there that Putin is using as leverage over the GOP. IMHO
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If Clinton was now president the republicans along with Trump, would have disputed the results and called for multiple investigations, and started impeachment. It would have been a rough 18 months for her.
-
Hillary Clinton would have been impeached and removed from office by now.
-
No but the proceedings would have been started. As is, we have a president with deep ties to a foreign government and a history of alleged sexual abuse.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or maybe if they had just conducted a thorough background investigation. No candidate should be able to run for office where they have access to highly classified material without one. If they can't pass, then they can't be candidate. Maybe we wouldn't be governed by the corrupt
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Imagine how different the 2016 election might have been if Trump’s mother had taken abortion-inducing pills.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You mean if the MSM had handled such a leak the same way they handled the DNC leak and had given Trump the same benefit of the doubt they gave HRC? Then, pretty much not different at all. I mean, come on:https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/16/cnns_chris_cuomo_remember_it_is_illegal_to_download_wikileaks_emails.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sure it was, but WikiLeaks would never embarrass him — that would have been against its Russian overlords' wishes.
-
It's interesting how Republicans hated WikiLeaks until 2016, and now it's the Democrats. Anyone who pisses off both of the corrupt, corporate American parties is good in my book.
-
Republicans disliked its lawlessness. Democrats dislike it now because it's literally an arm of the Russian government, selectively leaking items to try to harm Dems only. If you're going to be a truth-teller, tell the whole truth. They don't.
-
If you make a claim, you have to back it up with proof. This is conjecture at best, and lies at worst.
-
Oh, brother. It's conjecture that WikiLeaks targeted Democrats? That they're in cahoots with Russia? Open your eyes and look at who they go after and who they don't. Or wait until the shit finally hits the fan to be enlightened.
-
Back up your claim with facts.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.