Are you gonna take back trashing @SenFeinstein for protecting the victimpic.twitter.com/INEm8iKh4w
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Are you gonna take back trashing @SenFeinstein for protecting the victimpic.twitter.com/INEm8iKh4w
They should. After I read the NYer article, I thought it made Feinstein look bad, but I think (again) she did the right thing.
I knew @SenFeinstein was doing the right thing.
Bad timing on this tweet lol
Of course she did. Laughable, but in someone's pea brain worth the try? #goodgrief
Because she is lying
There are a bunch of other Brett Kavanaughs in the US.
Plenty of Beotch Trogs too.
This is so ridiculously juvenile. How can we even be talking about it? Kavanaugh is possibly the most impressively qualified nominee ever, but you would never know it.
He actually isn't. Too obviously partisan. Judges need to be credibly impartial.
Kavanaugh is incredibly impartial. That is his record. Far less partisanship there than others now sitting on the Court.
No. He's ridiculously partisan, a political operative who worked in the Bush White House, was a Bush lawyer during the Florida recount in 2000, he asked to break attorney-client priviledge in the Foster investigation, and lost in a 6-3 Supreme Court decision.
The man has over 300 published legal opinions which have been consistently upheld by the SCOTUS. He is decidedly and reliably in the middle as a jurist. We have not seen a more qualified nominee in many decades.
Of course we have seen more qualified, and never so brazenly partisan.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.