Dianne Feinstein whose personal driver for 20+ years was actually a Chinese spy? That Dianne?pic.twitter.com/rskljaxLuE
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Kavanaugh remembers unequivocally that his act of sexual aggression did not take place 40 years ago yet he cannot recall if he had conversations with certain individuals at certain law firms or whether he viewed pornography with Judge he clerked for etc. etc. which allegedly
-
Horrible comparison.
-
How so?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Another lie by DemocRATS. In any case, do you guys remember Bill Clinton having his dick sucked by Mrs Lewinsky???? And he continued being the US President. At least Monica spoke right away. It took a loooong time for this “anonymous” lady to speak out
-
See, here’s the thing...that affair was consensual. What is it with men? They don’t get that difference between consexual sex and rape. Consent is irrelevant. That’s why they rape.
-
More to my point. Was this the case (which I doubt it) why is it that the “anonymous lady” didn’t come up and spoke about it back then. This is just fabricated stuff, a desperate attempt to damage Kavanaugh’s reputation. Typical leftist action
-
#BelieveWomen#TimesUp
#MeToo
I was raped in college. If the man who raped me was up for the Supreme Court...you better believe I’d be on the news. It was 36 years ago and it hurts me every day. You don’t think the man who raped me should suffer for that? -
Oh, what a beautiful and moving piece of literature! Are you a writer?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He said, “ he could not recall”, which sounds like he may have done something like this often enough to not simply say it never happened.
-
Read the article, which says: “In a statement, Kavanaugh said, ‘I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time’.”
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’m a Democrat who really doesn’t want to see Brett Kavanaugh on SCOTUS, but I think this is bringing up events that may or may not have happened way in the past. Let’s stop digging for deep dirt and use what is already on the surface. He is not qualified. PERIOD.
-
Tell us how he is not qualified.
-
Because hes not willing to change the constitution to appease the deranged left
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And this is coming out now? I’m sorry but all this looks fabricated. There is no evidence.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Of course
@RonanFarrow comes in with the scoop! That man has supernatural journalism skills. - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.