https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WuJ5_j4U6HQ … @POLIV411 @gbgary54 @TheEsquireof212 @stylishsatirist @Paul_Reid2
“ This is London calling.” “This is the BBC.” @BBC @BBCWorldpic.twitter.com/hibIFt6YyF
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Men make up 96% of workplace fatalities. Basically feminists believe that they can work fewer hours at safer less skilled jobs and are still entitled to the same overall salary. It’s a childish sense of entitlementhttps://youtu.be/Hitc8haEu_g
-
Because feminists demand a safe working environment, women deserve to be paid less? Are you serious? And? What is the percentage of workplace INJURIES for women to men. By country. Oh, Neanderthal one.
-
I asked by Injury. Also, including Police Officers in this data, skews it. Nice try, Poindexter.
-
How does it skew it? It shows women work on average far safer jobs. The gender gap in workplace fatalities is curiously a gap feminists feminists never complain about. Nor the gap in suicides rates. Curious as to why

-
Well, I'll mansplain it. The data is skewed because it includes data that ONE would expect to see high numbers of fatalities. And are MALE dominated. But you are including it with data that one would not expect to see a difference. Such as office work.
-
No that isn’t a skew. Men work more dangerous jobs then women. More dangerous jobs should pay more than safer ones. When an equal number of women are willing to spend a month down the shaft of a coal mine then they can complain about unequal pay and have a valid complaint
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because those in authority are short sighted and often men. They don’t see the long term benefits in equality and rewards for performance. Often those in charge have little or limited training. Women suffer.
-
Lol yeah feminist gender studies majors clearly know more about running a business than the heads of industries


-
No because mountains of evidence prove that women are paid less for the same job. Was in it for 35 yearsso saw it every day.
-
By your own logic then, shouldn't women be working everywhere instead of men? Why would businesses that are working for profit hire costlier resource (men) for same job with same capability? Won't they want to increase their profits by hiring cheaper resource (women)?
-
Exactly and in a male dominated society as we have had for centuries, women were seen as the weaker sex and taken advatantage of. There are noticeable changes but habits persist. History is an influencer

-
So you agree women were not capable enough to do the job and hence paid less. Otherwise how can you describe the myth of gender pay gap when logically men should not be working anywhere if cheaper options are available for same capabilities?
-
Why would a sane person pay more for same resource if their intension is to make profit? Isn't the myth of gender pay gap busted by this simple logic?
-
Look at any corporate balance sheet. Different expenses, different rates; banking, insurance, profit ratio’ss, expense ratio’s etc.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I ran compensation programs for 3 decades and I can tell you salaries reflect the labor market. It's the law of supply and demand. If career fields get flooded with new talent, regardless of gender or race, it will drive down wages due to increased supply.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are a lot more men working 12 hour shifts at a factory or down a coal mine than women. Women think they can hang out in an air conditioned room singing their ABCs with a bunch of toddlers and think they deserve the same pay
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.