Since the USA at that time had only 656 Sub launched missiles in total, it seems unlikely that the USSR would be able to launch 2,200 simultaneously
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is nuclear war meaning destroying of the assets to seized senseless?
-
I’d rather to talk about takeover wars where baseball bit will be enough
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The author of The Age of Radiance replies: Let's all remember that 9/11 was done with box-cutters ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Today, the odds of a nuclear war being started by mistake are low—and yet the risk is growing because it won't be a mistake that'll start it,...it'll be insanity that does.pic.twitter.com/jRNg2FhuMa
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Look, if the media hadn't expended it's credibility, it would have been able to simultaneously sensationalize a War of the Worlds like global panic over Nibiru, and we (humanity) could have simultaneously launched most of our nuclear weapons at empty space, getting rid of them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By mistake?, much lower than provocated!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If anyone ever launches a nuclear weapon, it will be a mistake. A terrible mistake.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that 'mistake' is the compromised 'election' of Donald Trump
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.