Right. It's just been replaced with Trump v. Hawaii.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. They actually revived the spirit of Korematsu with this decision.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wrong! The majority voted for a Korematsu ruling in effect. Their denial to the contrary only reveals their cowardice!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The very fact specific fact pattern of K perhaps, but read Sotomayor's dissent and follow the majority's mode of analysis. 99.9% of cases will side on the prez's "national security" rationale.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No it is not. That part of the decision was obitur dictum and is not binding on any court.
-
The current justices care so little about the law. It makes me want to cry.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.