can we have community journal club where we sit around talking about these topics... thanks for sharing these wonderful gems
-
-
-
Thanks!
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
John Searle did a good critique of IIT and similar theories here: https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/01/10/can-information-theory-explain-consciousness/ … The basic idea is that information is observer-relative. A box of gas molecules has a lot of information in it from a particle physics standpoint, because the positition (cont'd)
-
and velocity of each particle can be considered 'information'. All physical systems have information of this form, the more particles the more information. The information is also 'causal' in the sense that molecules bouncing around in a box all 'cause' each other's movement (cnt
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
So essentially 20% of my doctoral course work was useless? Ouch.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I'm unconvinced about their claim that experience can be fully 'unfolded', their argument only works for one single act of perception that can be modeled as a pure terminating function; once you start interacting with your environment, causal structure is reestablishedpic.twitter.com/tTHbsbLq6k
-
apart from the more useful formalism (it does put some bounds on IIT related to the amount of useful information exchanged between agent and environment), it looks like the chinese room argument to me
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
@PabloRedux Obviously there are doubts re the IIT. FYI -
Thanks. Yes, IIT I'm dubious about, although highly interesting.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Whoops!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.