The work of @ranilillanjum and @SDMumford appeals to me in particular (but then, it tickles my biases).
-
-
-
I disagree with them pretty consistently, but I will definitely have some of their stuff on the reading list! They are super clear and interesting writers.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Cei Maslen’s work on causation?
-
I don't know their work at all, is there something that you would recommend? Titles look interesting.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Causation: A User's Guide by L. A. Paul and Ned Hall would probably be useful. Ken Waters is editing a collection of essays on biology and causation coming out from the University of Minnesota Press.
-
I was just thinking of the stuff that Paul had done; and adding some biology into the mix is definitely a good idea!
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I like nancy cartwright’s stuff a lot but it’s scattered throughout a lot of different papers
-
Me too!
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I’m not sure what a good reference in the philosophy literature, but something about the Lagrangian formalism and the principle of least action in physics, showcasing that causation isn’t a required or even very natural concept in modern physics.
-
(The Theoretical Minimum by Susskind and Hrabovsky is where I learned it, but it’s probably too technical for a philosophy class.)
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.