“Maybe a few of us can sacrifice 20% of our time to administration” is tempting, but you can’t really run an organization that way, and besides “sacrificing time to administration” is exactly what we didn’t want…pic.twitter.com/bQnoyPMrTF
Interested in inferential validity of network science. Also graphical models, statistical causal inference. Maker of skggm. Ph.D @RiceU_ECE | B.S @ECEILLINOIS
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
“Maybe a few of us can sacrifice 20% of our time to administration” is tempting, but you can’t really run an organization that way, and besides “sacrificing time to administration” is exactly what we didn’t want…pic.twitter.com/bQnoyPMrTF
What do you mean by administrative? Do you mean someone like Bode at Bell labs?
Hamming: I went to my boss, Bode, one day and said, "Why did you ever become department head? Why didn't you just be a good scientist?''
He said, "Hamming, I had a vision of what mathematics should be in Bell Laboratories. And I saw if that vision was going to be realized, I had to make it happen; I had to be department head.''
Well let me think out loud a bit… with the caveat that I have zero relevant knowledge (BTW I’ve read the Haming book but don’t remember that exchange or who Bode was)
Let’s say you have something around $10^8 you want to spend on nontraditional basic research (nontraditional because you understand there’s too much funding for run-of-the-mill science already).
And you aren’t going to be hiring individual scientists because you don't have the expertise and also you want to spend your time sailing or whatever. Instead you want to create an institution that will do that work for you, that you control but don't have to manage.
The anti-model and default option here is a "center of excellence." You pick an attractive-sounding, socially approved field and put up a building and fill it with the most credentialed people you can lure away from academic departments in that field.
You free those people from their university admin responsibilities, which is a plus. But they will mostly do slightly more of whatever they'd be doing in academia. They're stars, so they wouldn't be struggling for grants anyway.
And you probably end up with club full of like-minded cronies who are all pursuing the same approach to the same general topic. They don't have the necessary friction of people telling them they're doing everything wrong and their emperor is a naked baby.
My current thinking: A grant-maker/funder(s) should be in a position to recognize a credible reformer or rebel for any given field. And decisions should not be consensus driven.
YES
Who fits that description, how can a donor recognize them, how do we grow more of them?
“Credible” PLUS “rebel” is the golden combination. Another question is how we grow more of those!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.